Talk:Minnesota State Highway 36

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Interchange with MN 120[edit]

While researching future plans for a grade-separated interchange with MN 120, I came across two handouts in one, Washington County is requesting $50 million from the State of Minnesota as part of S.F. 2157 (H.F. 2543 in the House) for the total project. In the other, the county requests only $3 million for planning. I'm unsure how this should be described in the article, and if it should be at all, because aside from those two things, I couldn't find any actual plans. NotDragonius (talk) 02:10, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Update - I have sorted it out to my knowledge. NotDragonius (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Minnesota State Highway 36/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: NotDragonius (talk · contribs) 01:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 20:43, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to review this article!

QuickFail[edit]

If PR is not archived in 24 hours as of 20:43 22 May 2024 UTC then I will fail this article.

Source Check[edit]

Will spotcheck 13 sources. Using RNG.

[11]

[3]

[19]

[24]

[8]

[17]

[1]

[22]

[12]

[5]

[6]

[20]

[14] No SPS located

Recommendations[edit]

PLEASE use cite web templates or something because basic references is kind of annoying. Note: maps are a bit hard to navigate if used as a source. But I’m not going to fail because of other road GANs.

Overall[edit]

1a. nice work! Well polished

1b.

2(a,b,c)

2d. DAYUM 0.0% PERCENT FROM EARWIG https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Minnesota+State+Highway+36&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=0&turnitin=1

3a.

3b. this is an amazing article for a road! Most roads are super short but still get GA status.

4. read through shows no signs of a biased pov

5.

6a.

6b.

Closing comments[edit]

I would recommend merging short paragraphs with eachother in order to have more clarity.@User:NotDragonius congrats on a great road article!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

  • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by NotDragonius (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has less than 5 past nominations.

NotDragonius (talk) 03:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC).[reply]

  1. ^ "St. Croix Crossing". Minnesota Department of Transportation. August 2, 2017. Archived from the original on January 18, 2022. Retrieved August 3, 2017.